- Language
- 🇷🇺
- Joined
- Nov 10, 2022
- Messages
- 79
- Reaction score
- 168
- Points
- 33
I will share the table with you.
- Language
- 🇬🇧
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2023
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 284
- Points
- 63
Maybe it is just fair to add that temperatures over 180 °C like the named 200 and 210 °C for sure completely destroy P2P and even the Formamide, the resulting vapors and gases are highly toxic. Vent everything coming from top of the condenser outsides! Seriously!
Keep it below 180, better below 175°C and calibrate the Infrared thermometer to the flask/setting you use or you will never exactly know how hot it is.
Good luck
Keep it below 180, better below 175°C and calibrate the Infrared thermometer to the flask/setting you use or you will never exactly know how hot it is.
Good luck
↑View previous replies…
- Language
- 🇺🇸
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2024
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 37
- Points
- 18
Wait a second.. @OrgUnikum does that mean that after drying the methylene chloride you can potentially just start adding D-(-)-Tartaric acid (cas 147-71-7) and participating d-meth salt??
If so is there anymore literature on microwave irradiation? You guys are worth your weight in gold thank you.
If so is there anymore literature on microwave irradiation? You guys are worth your weight in gold thank you.
- Language
- 🇬🇧
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2023
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 284
- Points
- 63
Plenty literature but be aware that the trick is less the Microwaves but that this is a pressure vessel in a micro and the pressure makes it happen. I realized this myself only lately: The key to a successful Leuckart reaction for Amphetamine is to use a pressure vessel for reaction and hydrolysis. Methamphetamine can be made by the Leuckart without pressure vessel, yields are not stellar though, Al/Hg or NaBH4 is far better for this.
And separation of the Stereoisomeres, of d- meth and l-meth is not as easy as adding D-(-)-Tartaric acid, sorry. But there is no need for the rare and expensive D-(-)-Tartaric acid, the normal tartaric acid, the natural derived one, can be used. The process involves the natural tartaric acid 1/4 mol, HCl 1/2 mol, d/l-meth 1 mol and involves salt formation and partial dissolution/reformation of the salt (ripening) until virtually complete separation is achieved. Not trivial. Very temperature and setup dependent AFAIK.
And separation of the Stereoisomeres, of d- meth and l-meth is not as easy as adding D-(-)-Tartaric acid, sorry. But there is no need for the rare and expensive D-(-)-Tartaric acid, the normal tartaric acid, the natural derived one, can be used. The process involves the natural tartaric acid 1/4 mol, HCl 1/2 mol, d/l-meth 1 mol and involves salt formation and partial dissolution/reformation of the salt (ripening) until virtually complete separation is achieved. Not trivial. Very temperature and setup dependent AFAIK.
- Language
- 🇺🇸
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2024
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 37
- Points
- 18
When you say yields are not stellar what type of percentage are we talking? Is it not similar too the study above with the Methly derivative of formamide?
The reason for the use of D-(-)-Tartaric instead of the natural derived one is because I have it readily available and free. The solid mass is the D isomer and the solution is the L isomer correct?
The reason for the use of D-(-)-Tartaric instead of the natural derived one is because I have it readily available and free. The solid mass is the D isomer and the solution is the L isomer correct?
- Language
- 🇺🇸
- Joined
- Feb 18, 2024
- Messages
- 68
- Reaction score
- 37
- Points
- 18
- Language
- 🇬🇧
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2023
- Messages
- 334
- Reaction score
- 284
- Points
- 63
And as a free service from yours truly, the ratios for P2P:
Formamide 50 ml 1,5 mol
formic acid 56 ml 1,5 mol
P2P 66 ml 0,5 mol
Formamide 50 ml 1,5 mol
formic acid 56 ml 1,5 mol
P2P 66 ml 0,5 mol